Legal Opinion

Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. Waldo

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1939No. Docket No. 21, Calendar No. 40,368PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChandler, J.

Plaintiff, successor to the White Star Refining Company, declared on the common counts in assumpsit for the price of certain petroleum products furnished defendant and resold by the latter at retail. Defendant’s answer admitted the items in question, with the exception of certain rebates claimed by him. The controversy involves the matters raised by defendant’s counterclaim in which he claims damages for breach, by plaintiff’s predecessor, of an alleged contract whereby he was to be made wholesale distributor of plaintiff’s prod uets in the city of Kalamazoo and certain territory adjacent…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McKell v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
  2. Shepard v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. GormanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  4. Sibley v. FeltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  5. Peer v. HughesArizona Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Opdyke Investment v. NORRIS GRAIN COMPANYMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Heritage Broadcasting Co. v. Wilson Communications, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Hansen v. CatsmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Professional Facilities Corp. v. MarksMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Brodsky v. Allen Hayosh Industries, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API