Hansen v. Catsman

Plaintiff brought action for damages for breach of contract against defendant Catsman; and for damages for interference with contractual rights by defendant Herrlich. Proofs in the trial court were taken on, and limited to, the issue of whether there was a contract between the parties. A judgment in defendants’ favor was rendered upon motion for directed verdict, from which plaintiff appeals.

It is alleged by plaintiff that he and the Catsman Realty Company through its president, Samuel M. Catsman, entered into an agreement whereby the realty company, for certain stipulated rental payments,…