Legal Opinion

Peer v. Hughes

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1923No. Civil No. 2044PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

The foundation of this lawsuit is the following instrument:

“Chloride, Arizona, Jany. 28, 1916. “Memorandum of agreement by and between J. B. Hughes of Chloride, Arizona, and G. W. Peer, of Los Angeles, Calif.
“Said J. B. Hughes, as the owner thereof, agrees to bond and lease the group of claims known as the Bobbie Burns group, consisting of the Bobbie Burns, Bobbie Burns Extension, Bobbie Burns 2d, and Bobbie Burns 3d claims, located in the Haulpi mining district, Mohave county, Arizona, for and in consideration of the payment to him of the sum of one dollar, the receipt whereof is hereby…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dillingham v. DahlgrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. McKell v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
  3. Shepard v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. GormanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. Sibley v. FeltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. American Mining Co. v. Himrod-Kimball Mines Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  2. Dutch Inns of America, Inc. v. Horizon CorporationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  3. T. D. Dennis Builder, Inc. v. GoffArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Cypert v. HolmesArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. WaldoMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API