Legal Opinion

Haag v. Pollack

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided August 10, 1992No. 19419PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

This case concerns the breach of a real estate sales contract and its prohibition against assignment without the seller’s consent. The sellers are John and Mary Haag, plaintiffs-respondents in this action. In 1981, the buyers, defendants-appellants Steven and Pettra Pollack, entered into a “lease-purchase” agreement with Thomas and Maxine Howell, third party plaintiffs-appellants, and then in 1989 attempted to effect an assignment of the Haag contract to the Howells. The Haags sued, arguing that the earlier lease-purchase agreement was a disguised assignment made without…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Quick v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Salinas v. VierstraIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Robertson v. RichardsIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Garrett Freightlines, Inc. v. Bannock Paving Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Jones v. Panhandle Distributors, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re WiersmaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2002
  2. Angelos v. SchatzelIdaho Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API