Fairchild v. Brock
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.
These appeals are from judgments for defendants after orders sustaining demurrers without leave to amend.
In the first action plaintiffs allege in their amended complaint that plaintiff Howell purchased a steer from one Mr. Dink and that plaintiffs Howell and Fairchild entered into an agreement whereby Fairchild was to slaughter the steer upon •premises owned by Howell; that Howell is a resident of Orange County and owns real property therein which he farms, raising and marketing various crops; that plaintiff Fairchild is a resident, farmer in the same county and raises cattle, bovine animals,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Agricultural Prorate Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Bueneman v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Brock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Brock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Sullivan v. San Francisco Gas Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Signal Oil & Gas Co. v. Ashland Oil & Refining Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
- Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Manchel v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Signal Oil & Gas Co. v. Ashland Oil & Refining Co.California Supreme Court · 1958