Legal Opinion
Dickens v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 30, 1944No. Appeal, 23PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Maxey,
This is an appeal from the decree of the court below discharging a rule to show cause why arbitration should not proceed in the manner provided in the agreement between the parties. The Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, an instrumentality of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, created by the Act of May 21,1937, P. L. 774, entered into a contract dated June 22, 1939, with the plaintiff, Dickens, for the construction of a part of the Pennsylvania Turnpike situate in Somerset County. The work on this contract was completed on July 3,1940.
The basis of payment was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Britex Waste Co. v. Nathan Schwab & Sons, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Hague v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865
3Cited by12 opinions
- Batter Building Materials Co. v. KirschnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- SBC Interactive, Inc. v. Corporate Media PartnersSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
- Ross Development Co. v. Advanced Building Development, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Batson Yarn & Fabrics MacHinery Goup, Inc. v. Saurer-Allma GmbH-Allgauer MaschinenbauDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1970
- Brick Tp. Mun. Util. Auth. v. Diversified RB & T. Construction Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.