Legal Opinion

Dorr v. Newman

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1990No. 89-74PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

URBIGKIT, Justice.

Appellant Mark Dorr (Dorr) appeals from an amended order increasing alimony payments to his former wife, Appellee Peggy J. Newman (Newman). We affirm the decision of the district court except to require deletion of that portion of the final order which alters the tax consequences of the increased alimony award.

Dorr questions whether:

I. * * * the court erred in ordering additional alimony when additional alimony was not pled by defendant.

II. * * * there has been a sufficient change of circumstances to justify a modification of the decree.

III. * * * the evidence supports an…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Martin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Elizabeth H. Bardwell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  3. Grosskopf v. GrosskopfWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Hardisty v. HardistySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  5. Ernest H. Mills v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Ernest H. Mills and Loretta E. Mills v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Jones v. JonesWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Ready v. ReadyWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Smith v. SmithWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Pasenelli v. PasenelliWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Harshfield v. HarshfieldWyoming Supreme Court · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API