Legal Opinion
In Re Barneys
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 24, 2004No. 02-BG-1218PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
The Board on Professional Responsibility (the Board) recommends imposition of reciprocal discipline on respondent (Barneys) in the form of disbarment, based upon a decision of the Court of Appeals of Maryland unconditionally excluding Barneys “from the admission to or exercise of any privilege to practice law in [Maryland].” Maryland Rule 16-701(e); see Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Maryland v. Barneys, 370 Md. 566, 805 A.2d 1040 (2002) {Barneys I). Having made no appearance until now in these reciprocal discipline proceedings, Barneys argues for the first time that he…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re SpannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BarneysCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- In Re HoldmannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re DruryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re HarperDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re LebowitzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- IN RE MELINDA MALDONADODistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- In Re Harris-SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In re BuffingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006