Intellidata Inc. v. State Board of Equalization
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MILLER, J.
In this action we consider whether transactions between keypunch service companies and their customers are properly taxable as sales of tangible personal property within the meaning of the California Sales and Use Tax Law. (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 6001 et seq.)
The underlying facts in this case are generally undisputed. Intellidata Incorporated (hereinafter plaintiff) is a computer service bureau. Among other operations it provides keypunching services for corporations that own their own computer. The keypunching service may be described as follows:
Plaintiffs customer delivered…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bullock v. Statistical Tabulating Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1977
- Simplicity Pattern Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Albers v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- People v. GrazerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Acco Contractors, Inc. v. McNamara & Peepe Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
3Cited by5 opinions
- Preston v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Comptroller of the Treasury v. Equitable Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- General Business Systems, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- MCI Airsignal, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Preston v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001