Legal Opinion
Winn v. Krow
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 1, 1930No. 19470PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLETON, C. A. D.
Krow brought suit in the district court of Pawnee county against William H. Winn, Ray Tansel et al. Judgment was for the plaintiff. The defendants, William H. Winn and Ray Tansel appeal. These parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendants, as they appeared in the trial court.
The original petition alleged two causes of action. In the first cause of action he pleaded that in January, 1922, pursuant to an oral agreement with Winn and Tansel, he purchased an oil lease covering certain property in Pawnee county; that he was to be carried in said lease for an undivided…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Quinn v. PhippsSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Prince v. GosnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Hobson v. Heirs of McArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Pratt v. RatliffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
- Clem Oil Co. v. OliverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Heck & Paetow Claim Service, Inc. v. HeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Eudaly v. Superior Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Smith v. Fourth Nat. Bank of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940