Legal Opinion

State v. Trevino

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 7, 1994No. 13272-2-IIIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sweeney, A.C.J.

The State of Washington appeals suppression of evidence of a mouth examination given before the suspect was read his Miranda1 rights in the course of a BAC Verifier DataMaster breath test. The State contends (1) the CrRLJ 3.1 2 right to counsel does not attach before an officer asks to look or looks into a suspect’s mouth for purposes of a driving while under the influence of alcohol (DWI) investiga*498tion; and (2) a DWI suspect must show actual prejudice to establish a violation of his right to a lawyer. We affirm.

Facts

On January 1, 1992, just after midnight, Deputy Randy…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. FitzsimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. FitzsimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Heinemann v. Whitman CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. SchulzeWashington Supreme Court · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. TrevinoWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. LozanoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  3. State v. LozanoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API