State v. Trevino
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Sweeney, A.C.J.
The State of Washington appeals suppression of evidence of a mouth examination given before the suspect was read his Miranda1 rights in the course of a BAC Verifier DataMaster breath test. The State contends (1) the CrRLJ 3.1 2 right to counsel does not attach before an officer asks to look or looks into a suspect’s mouth for purposes of a driving while under the influence of alcohol (DWI) investiga*498tion; and (2) a DWI suspect must show actual prejudice to establish a violation of his right to a lawyer. We affirm.
Facts
On January 1, 1992, just after midnight, Deputy Randy…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. FitzsimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. FitzsimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Heinemann v. Whitman CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. SchulzeWashington Supreme Court · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. TrevinoWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. LozanoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- State v. LozanoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994