State v. Lozano
Court of Appeals of Washington
1DissentSchultheis, J.
(dissenting) — "It is inconceivable that, 27 years after the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 16 L. Ed. 2d 694, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 10 A.L.R.3d 974 (1966), law enforcement officers play games with advising arrestees of their Miranda rights.” State v. Trevino, 74 Wn. App. 496, 503, 873 P.2d 1214 (1994) (Munson, J., dissenting), petition for review filed June 20, 1994, Supreme Court cause 61890-9. Difficult issues arise in the Miranda context from time to time which try the conceptual talents of bar and bench. It is unrealistic to ascribe to police…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.