Legal Opinion

Bache Halsey Stuart, Inc. v. French

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 14, 1977No. Civ. A. 76-1803PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SIRICA, District Judge.

In this action, Bache Halsey Stuart, Inc. (Bache), a commodity brokerage firm, seeks to invoke an arbitration clause contained in a contract with Charles E. French, a former Bache customer, as a basis for requiring French to arbitrate a dispute he has with Bache. Additionally, Bache seeks an order enjoining French from proceeding any fur ther with an administrative action he has filed with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Jurisdiction is founded upon diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1332, and the Federal Arbitration Act…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. American Safety Equipment Corp. v. J. P. Maguire & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  3. Arkoosh v. Dean Witter & Co., Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1976

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Leist v. SimplotCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  2. S & M Constructors, Inc. v. The Foley CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  3. Dominic Marchese v. Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. Societe Nationale Algerienne Pour La Recherche, La Production, Le Transport, La Transformation Et La Commercialisation Des Hydrocarbures v. Distrigas Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1987
  5. Smith v. GrooverDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API