Legal Opinion

Dominic Marchese v. Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 1, 1984No. 83-6013, 83-6014PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SKOPIL, Circuit Judge:

This case concerns two separate district court actions that have been consolidated on appeal. We are again “confronted with the competing tensions of access to the courts and arbitration.” Amaro v. Continental Can Co., 724 F.2d 747, 748 (9th Cir.1984). At the outset we must decide if a valid arbitration agreement exists between the parties. If we hold such an agreement exists, we must then decide: (1) whether a declaratory relief action concerning interpretation of a provision of the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”) is properly referable to arbitration; (2) whether the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Gabrielson v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. Donald D. Dial and Horace G. SalmonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Letizia v. Prudential Bache Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Lowell E. Harter and Doretta Harter v. Iowa Grain Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API