Legal Opinion

Austin Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 12, 1923No. 47-APublishedCited by 5 opinions

The Reporter’s statement of the case: The following are the facts of the case as found by the court: I. The plaintiff, the Austin Co., and the United States on or about the dates hereinafter mentioned entered into written contracts as follows: Bureau of Yards and Docks, contract No. 2713, December 13,1917, for 22 powder dry houses. Bureau of Yards and Docks, contract No. 2602, December 24, 1917, for two blending towers.

Read the full summary

The Reporter’s statement of the case: The following are the facts of the case as found by the court: I. The plaintiff, the Austin Co., and the United States on or about the dates hereinafter mentioned entered into written contracts as follows: Bureau of Yards and Docks, contract No. 2713, December 13,1917, for 22 powder dry houses. Bureau of Yards and Docks, contract No. 2602, December 24, 1917, for two blending towers. Bureau of Yards and Docks, contract No. 2715, December 24, 1917, for powerhouse extension. Bureau of Yards and Docks, contract No. 2747, December 24, 1917, for two magazine…

1Opinion of the Court

Camebell, Ohief Justice,

delivered the opinion of the court:

On or about December 13, 1917, the Austin Co. entered into a contract (No. 2713) with the defendant, represented by the Bureau of Yards and Docks, for the construction and completion of 22 powder dry houses, in accordance with certain specifications, the work to be done at the defendant’s naval proving ground, Indianhead, Md. The work was to be done under what is called a “ cost-plus ” contract. It involved an estimated expenditure of approximately $366,-000. The defendant had let contracts for other work at Indianhead to other…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. GleasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Brogan v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. United States v. United Engineering & Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Plumley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Lowrey v. HawaiiSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Waxman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  2. Austin Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924
  3. James Stewart & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924
  4. Twin City Forge & Foundry Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925
  5. Waxman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API