Legal Opinion

Waxman v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 5, 1953No. Nos. 48761, 48766, 48859Published

1Opinion of the Court

HOWELL, Judge.

The cause of action before the court for determination is common to three separate suits which were accordingly consolidated for trial.1 Plaintiffs have brought their actions under the War Contract Hardship Claims Act,2 also known as the Lucas Act, for an equitable determination praying for relief from alleged losses suffered in the performance of contracts entered into by Acme with the United States. The Contracts were entered itito and performed, and the alleged losses sustained, between September 16, 1940 and August 14, 1945. Defendant has raised a number of contentions in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Work v. United States Ex Rel. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Goodman v. NiblackSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Ramsey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  4. Royal Indemnity Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
  5. Wilbur v. U. S. Ex Rel. Vindicator Consolidated Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API