Legal Opinion

In re EDC Contractor Insurance Litigation

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 24, 2006No. CW 2005-1064PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Judge.

hAt issue in this writ application is whether the trial court properly denied *464summary judgment sought by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Liberty Mutual) regarding a commercial general liability (CGL) policy it issued to S & B Engineers & Constructors, Ltd. (S & B). For the following reasons, we deny the writ.

Facts

In the mid-1990’s, Conoco discovered that ethylene dichloride (EDC) had been discharged on its premises. As a result of the EDC discharge, Conoco contracted with S & B and numerous other contractors to recover the discharged EDC and to remediate EDC-damaged property…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hines v. GarrettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  2. Champagne v. WardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  3. Norfolk Southern Corp. v. Calif. Union Ins.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Resure, Inc. v. Chemical Distributors, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1996
  5. Holcomb v. Universal Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nelson Radiology Associates, L.L.C. v. Integrity Medical Systems, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API