Legal Opinion

Dr. Ricardo Mestre v. City of Atlanta

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 20, 1958No. 17064PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment denying plaintiffs’ prayer for an injunction entered after a final hearing. In support of his judgment, the district judge made findings of fact and conclusions of law 1 which correctly and adequately state the facts and the controlling principles of law. Because they do, we adopt them as our own and order the judgment

Affirmed.

1. Findings of Fact:

“In 1954 the City of Atlanta zoned a portion of the Ottley property as C-l, Community Business District, this portion so zoned extended back a distance of approximately 400 feet from Peachtree Road — the remainder of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Gorieb v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Standard Oil Co. v. City of MarysvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Standard Oil Co. v. City of TallahasseeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. The National Foundation v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. DeKalb County v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1972
  3. National Foundation v. City of Fort WorthDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1967
  4. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. City of West Palm Beach, FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  5. Kingsberry Homes Corp. v. Gwinnett County, GeorgiaDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API