Legal Opinion
Beaver Valley Painting, Inc. v. Terminal Construction Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 27, 1962No. Civ. A. No. 292-60Published
1Opinion of the Court
WORTENDYKE, District Judge.
The Court’s jurisdiction in this action is appropriately predicated upon diversity of citizenship with the requisite jurisdictional minimum involved. 28 U. S.C. § 1332(a). Plaintiff, Beaver Valley Painting, Inc. (hereinafter Beaver Valley), a painting subcontractor with Terminal Construction Corp. (Terminal), sued Terminal for damages for breach of the subcontract. Terminal counterclaimed against Beaver Valley, joining Beaver Valley’s bond surety as a co-plaintiff to respond, with Beaver Valley, to the counterclaim. Terminal was the general contractor with the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Apex Metal Stamping Co. v. Alexander & Sawyer, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Wilson v. BordenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
- Goldman v. ShapiroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.