Legal Opinion
Goldman v. Shapiro
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 27, 1951PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
16 N.J. Super. 324 (1951)
84 A.2d 628
WILLIAM A. GOLDMAN AND PAULA R. GOLDMAN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
SAM SHAPIRO, HUGO PRONTI, AND EMCO CEMENT PRODUCTS, INC., A CORPORATION OF PENNSYLVANIA, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 19, 1951.
Decided November 27, 1951.
Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE, and WM. J. BRENNAN, JR.
Mr. Leo Yanoff argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Julius A. Feinberg and Messrs. Green and Yanoff, attorneys; Mr. Albert Burstein, on the brief).
Mr. David B. Schackner argued the cause for respondents (Messrs.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- SERIES PUBLISHERS, INC. v. GreeneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Wharton v. StoutenburghSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1882
- Kehoe v. Mayor of RutherfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
- Bancroft Realty Co. v. AlencewiczNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Demoors v. Atlantic Casualty Insurance CompanyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Leitner v. BraenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- JL Davis & Associates v. HeidlerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Lee v. FooteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Zulla Steel, Inc. v. a & M GREGOS, INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Cherr v. RubensteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.