Legal Opinion

Francisco Arcibal v. Warden Bean

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided February 24, 2026No. 2:23-cv-00097Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 FRANCISCO ARCIBAL, Case No. 2:23-cv-00097-ART-NJK 6 Petitioner, ORDER v. 7 WARDEN BEAN, 8 Respondents. 9 10 This habeas matter is brought by Petitioner Francisco Arcibal and is before 11 the Court for consideration of Arcibal’s Motion for Discovery. ECF No. 37 In 12 addition, Respondents move to dismiss Ground 1 of the first amended petition as 13 unexhausted. ECF No. 51. Also before the Court are Respondents’ Motion to Seal 14 and Motion to Extend. ECF Nos. 48, 57. For the reasons discussed below, the 15 Court denies Arcibal’s Motion…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API