Legal Opinion
Szulik v. Tagliaferri
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 21, 2013No. 12 Civ. 1827(PKC)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
P. KEVIN CASTEL, District Judge:
In a Second Amended Complaint (the “SAC”), plaintiffs allege that James S. Tagliaferri and Patricia J. Cornell, investment managers, made numerous improper investments and engaged in a “kickback” scheme with a thoroughbred horse racing company. Against Tagliaferri and Cornell, the SAC alleges violations of sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, as well as numerous state-law claims. The fraud-based claims are based solely on the alleged “kickback” scheme. Additionally,…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Levy v. MaggioreDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Altayyar v. Etsy, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Ragner Tech. Corp. v. BerardiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
- William L. Thorp Revocable Trust v. Ameritas Investment Corp.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2014
- In re Soundview Elite Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.