Legal Opinion
United States v. Jieme N. Portin, United States of America v. Ruben Y. Navarro
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 1, 1994No. 93-10397, 93-10398PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Jieme N. Portin and Ruben Y. Navarro appeal their sentences imposed following entry of guilty pleas to conspiracy to commit interstate travel in aid of racketeering enterprises in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 371, 1952 (“ITAR bribery”), and wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 371, 1343. Appellants contend the district court exceeded its authority to correct sentencing errors pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(c) by increasing the appellants’ fines when it corrected an error as to the custodial portion of their sentences. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We vacate the…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Robert Eugene Kennedy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Brenton Neil Mullins, United States of America v. Phillip Ross Rinker, United States of America v. James Robert WinklemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Gregory G. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. JordanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Jose Leonardo Contreras-SubiasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Raymond Joseph LopezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Ramon Wilberto Abreu-CabreraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Miriam AguirreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Barragan-MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael Thomas COLACE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.