Legal Opinion
United States v. Barragan-Mendoza
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 19, 1999No. 97-30264PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SKOPIL, Circuit Judge:
I. Overview
Gabriel Barragan-Mendoza (Barragan) pleaded guilty to unlawful possession with intent to distribute cocaine and unlawful distribution of cocaine and was sentenced. After the government filed a motion to reconsider that sentence, the district court held an evidentiary hearing and entered an amended judgment increasing Barragan’s sentence. Barragan contends on appeal that the district court was without jurisdiction to amend his sentence because the court failed to act within the seven-day time period afforded by Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(c) for correcting an erroneous…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. DieterSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. HealySupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. IbarraSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. MorilloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Novenda L. CookCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Daniel P. RossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Miriam AguirreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Hector Ramon Diaz-ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Townsend, DerrickCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.