Legal Opinion
United States v. Jordan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 12, 1989No. Nos. 88-5081, 88-5082PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:
Defendants Marcel Jordan and Mark Meng appeal the district court’s order correcting their original sentences. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We reverse and remand for resentencing.
FACTS
Jordan and Meng were convicted of multiple felonies including nineteen counts of mail fraud. On May 21, 1987, the district court sentenced Jordan and Meng to serve twelve years in prison for each of the nineteen mail fraud counts. These twelve-year terms were to run concurrently. The court also ordered payment of certain fines and restitution, but this part of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Edward Ford, Robert Little, John Felix, Solomon Johnson, Phillip Usquiano, Marcus Thompson, E. Dene ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Robert Eugene Kennedy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- United States v. EdmonsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. James S. JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. Lewis R. KulczykCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Vincent CaterinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Mario Moreno-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Golden v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.