Legal Opinion

Diefenbach v. State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 6, 1965No. 44,179PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hatcher, C.:

This controversy steins from an award in a condemnation proceeding.

The State Highway Commission determined that it was in the public interest to build a controlled-access highway which would by-pass Wichita, Kansas on the west and north in such a manner as to connect State Highway 254 running east to El Dorado, Kansas with Interstate Highway 235 and avoid the necessity of the traffic passing through the city of Wichita. It was necessary to condemn certain lands for such purpose including part of appellants’ land.

The appellant landowners own…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Will v. HughesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  2. Sutton v. FrazierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  3. Gaynes v. WallingfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  4. Roberts v. Upper Verdigris Watershed Joint District No. 24Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  5. Taylor v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Neighbor v. Westar Energy, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. City of Mission Hills v. SextonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. Wozniak v. LipoffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  4. George v. Bolen-Williams, RealtorsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
  5. Humphries v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API