Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Loud

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1907No. Docket No. 103PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to Alpena; Emerick, J. Trespass quare clausum fregit by George B. Holmes and John Nicholson, copartners as Holmes & Nicholson, against Henry N. Loud, George A. Loud, and Edward F. Loud, copartners as H. M. Loud’s Sons Company. There was judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, C. J.

Plaintiffs sued defendants in the circuit court of Iosco county to recover damages for injury to the freehold of certain lands asserted to be owned by them, such injury having been caused by defendants wrongfully entering upon said lands and cutting down and carrying away the timber standing thereon. Plaintiffs declared in trespass upon section 11204, 3 Comp. Laws, which provides for the recovery of treble damages. By stipulation the case was transferred to and tried in Alpena county. A verdict was rendered in favor of plaintiffs for $3,461.60. Certain special questions were answered by the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Final v. BackusMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Griffin v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Grant v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Huron Land Co. v. RobargeMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Adkin v. PillenMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Reetz v. Kinsman Marine Transit Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Fishleigh v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Jones v. HicksMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Garford Motor Truck Co. v. BucksonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1927
  5. Holmes v. SouleMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API