Amezcua v. Los Angeles Harley-Davidson, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUBIN, Acting P. J.
Plaintiffs and appellants Robert and Nancy Amezcua (individually Robert and Nancy, collectively the Amezcuas) appeal from the summary judgment entered against them and in favor of defendant and respondent Los Angeles Harley-Davidson, Inc. (Harley-Davidson). The Amezcuas sued Harley-Davidson for damages arising out of injuries they suffered in a collision which occurred while they were riding in the 2006 “Pursuit for Kids Toy Drive,” a group motorcycle ride organized annually by Harley-Davidson (the 2006 Toy Ride). Appellants contend (1) Harley-Davidson owed a duty of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
- Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Artiglio v. Corning Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Nalwa v. Cedar Fair, L.P.California Supreme Court · 2012
- Moore v. William Jessup UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Willhide-Michiulis v. Mammoth Mountain Ski Area, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Estate of McNeil ex rel. Berkes v. FreestyleMX.com, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2016
- Foltz v. Johnson, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.