Legal Opinion

Fuhring v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 15, 1924No. 11782PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JARMAN, C.

This action was brought by tbe plaintiff, Joseph Fuhring, against the Chicago. Rook Island & Pacific Railway Company in the district court of Canadian county to recover damages to the crops and land of the plaintiff, alleged to have been caused by the defendant constructing dykes, embankments and a certain bridge on tbe South Canadian river, thereby diverting the channel of said river and causing it to flow upon and across the lands of the plaintiff. The cause was tried to a jury, resulting in a verdict for the defendant, on which judgment was rendered, and the plaintiff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. GillettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Tucker v. ThravesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Harn v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. American Nat. Ins. Co. v. RardinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Elwood Oil & Gas Co. v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beatty v. BeattySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Voss v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Voss v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API