Legal Opinion
Bartholomew v. Impastato
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 29, 1943No. 17786PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff, Eddie Bartholomew, appearing individually and on behalf of his minor son, Calvin Bartholomew, brought this suit against Jake, Ignatius and Pecobio Impastato, Mrs. Mamie Impastato, wife of Anthony Cassisa, Mrs. Lena Impastato, wife of James Serio, Mrs. Mary Impastato, wife of Burns Garic, and Mrs. Cecile Lo Cicero, widow of Francesco Impastato, individually and as natural tutrix of the minors Rosalie, Leon and Frank Impastato, seeking a judgment for damages against them, in solido, for the personal injuries sustained by his minor child, when it fell from the second story balcony…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- La Casse v. New Orleans, T. & M. R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
- Duplain v. WiltzLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
- Rome v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
- Soniat v. WhiteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- Trumbaturi v. Katz & Besthoff, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Roy O. Martin Lumber Co. v. Saint Denis Securities Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
- Kennedy v. Perry Timber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
- Wischer v. Madison Realty CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
- Kline v. DawsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.