Legal Opinion

The Saginaw

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 2, 1905PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Admiralty. Suits for limitation of liability on account of collision. On exceptions to commissioner’s report. Wing, Putnam & Burlingham, for the Old Dominion Steamship ■Company.

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, District Judge.

These are exceptions to the commissioner’s report made in consequence of the decision of this court on the merits of the applications of the owners of the steamships *907Hamilton and Saginaw to limit their liability. See In re Clyde S. S. Co., etc. (D. C.) 134 Fed. 95.

The report is as follows:

“The interlocutory decree directed me:

‘(1) To take proof as to the amount, validity and priority of all claims for property losses to which exceptions shall be filed as aforesaid, and to report upon the total damages sustained by the two colliding vessels, as well as by the loss and…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Slater v. Mexican National RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Stewart v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Northern Pacific Railroad v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Steamboat Co. v. ChaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Herrick v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Petition of Gulf Oil CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  2. The Princess SophiaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1929
  3. Trauffler v. Detroit & Cleveland Navigation Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1910
  4. G.M.M. v. KimpsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  5. McMillan v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API