Legal Opinion

People v. Clark

California Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1965No. Crim. 8990PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment after trial before the court without a jury, finding defendant guilty of violating section 288 of the Penal Code, he appeals.

Facts: The prosecutrix, Autumn Landers, the 11-year-old stepdaughter of defendant, testified, in substance, that during the period November 15, 1962, through May 22 of the following year defendant on three separate dates took her into his bedroom and had sexual intercourse with her. Defendant denied having sexually molested her at any time.

Question: Did the trial court err in restricting the scope of the cross-examination of the prosecutrix and the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. WestekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. People v. BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. People v. HurlburtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. People v. SchollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. SchwartzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. State v. SteeleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  3. People v. MascarenasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Andrews v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. People v. KnoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API