Legal Opinion

People v. Scholl

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 13, 1964No. Crim. 9282PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.

Defendant was convicted by court trial of violation of sections 288 and 288a of the Penal Code, sexual offenses upon a female child 8 years of age. Defendant appeals from the order of the trial court denying a new trial. (Pen. Code, § 1237, subd. 2.)

Contentions on appeal are generally that (1) the child prosecutrix, by reason of inability to receive just impressions and to relate them truly, failed to qualify as a competent witness; that her testimony was uncorroborated with respect to the convicting acts; (2) the evidence was insufficient, assuming the child’s competency as a witness, to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. People v. SlobodionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. People v. SylviaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. People v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. People v. HurlburtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ballard v. Superior Court of San Diego CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Curry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. MascarenasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. People v. ButlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. People v. NewtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API