Legal Opinion

In Re Motion of Ellsworth H. Mosher

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided October 17, 1957No. 956PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner has moved the “full court” under Rule 12 for an order directing the clerk of the court to provide photostatic or other copies of the decision or decisions of the Patent Office Board of Appeals as set forth in the Transcript of Record that was filed in a patent appeal before this court. The motion is in proper form and is accompanied by the fee required by the Rules of this court for the making of the copies.

The appeal in question is presently pending before this court and has not yet been heard. Petitioner is not a party to the appeal nor has he alleged any special interest therein.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brewer v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  2. Ex parte DrawbaughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Stenstrom v. HarnettNew York Supreme Court · 1927
  4. People ex rel. Stenstrom v. HarnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  5. Brewer v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Washington Legal Foundation v. United States Sentencing CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  3. Willie Nelson Music Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  4. United States v. MitchellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975
  5. Hutchins v. Texas Rehabilitation CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API