Legal Opinion
United States v. Mitchell
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 8, 1975No. Misc. 74-128PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GESELL, District Judge.
Several television and radio broadcasters noted in the caption moved pursuant to Rule 47 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure requesting copies of those portions of taped conversations initially recorded in former President Nixon’s offices which were subpoenaed, received in evidence, and played to the jury in this widely publicized criminal case still on trial before Judge John J. Sirica. Copying would be accomplished at applicants’ expense with the aid of the Clerk of Court from the evidentiary tapes. There would be no recording in the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Estes v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Craig v. HarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. HubbardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- United States v. ChagraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Westmoreland v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.