Legal Opinion

Talbot v. Schroeder

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 23, 1970No. 2 CA-CIV 850PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUCKER, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Shirley Talbot and her husband, brought an action for legal malpractice against Donald R. Schroeder. The court, sitting with a jury, directed a verdict for defendant. Plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial was denied and plaintiffs therefore appeal.

The facts are as follows. Defendant undertook to act as Mrs. Talbot’s lawyer in a divorce action when she was known as Mrs. Hall. Defendant filed a temporary restraining order against Mr. Hall and set time for hearing. In the interim, defendant contacted Mr. Hall’s lawyer. Mr. Hall then filed a petition to have plaintiff…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hodges v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Scott v. ScottArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Apache Railway Co. v. ShumwayArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  4. In Re GreerArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Martin v. BurnsArizona Supreme Court · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cecala v. NewmanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2007
  2. Molever v. RoushCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  3. Schmidt v. Pearson, Evans and ChadwickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Matthews v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 1995
  5. Kaufman v. JesserDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API