Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Pearson, Evans and Chadwick

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 4, 1996No. 95-519PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

The appellants, Paul A., Pauline B., and Paul G. Schmidt, bring this legal malpractice suit against attorneys C. Thomas Pearson, Jr., and Steven Tennant for their alleged negligence committed in Schmidt v. McIlroy Bank & Trust, 306 Ark. 28, 811 S.W.2d 281 (1991).1 Schmidt involved the Schmidts’ lender-liability action against Mcllroy Bank & Trust. This court affirmed an award of summary judgment dismissing the Schmidts’ suit against Mcllroy Bank because they failed to make a timely amendment to their complaint alleging their status or standing as guarantors of their…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. George v. CatonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Harold McLaughlin Reliable Truck Brokers, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Fayetteville School District No. 1 v. Arkansas State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Anthony v. KaplanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Herston v. WhitesellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pugh v. GriggsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Barnes v. EverettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Conagra, Inc. v. StrotherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Allen v. AllisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Berry v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API