Legal Opinion

State ex rel. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 18, 18A, 18B, 18C, 18RA v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1992No. 90-1780PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The case presents a single question: When negotiations between public employees represented by an exclusive bargaining agent and a city have not produced a collective bargaining agreement, will mandamus lie to resolve a wage dispute by compelling compliance with a city charter provision pursuant to R.C. 4117.10(A)? We find that it does, and reverse the decision of the court of appeals and allow the writ.

The city contends that mandamus is not appropriate because of the availability of other remedies, namely R.C. 4117.11, 4117.12 and 4117.14. Although the city characterizes the negotiation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Caspar v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State ex rel. Clark v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Bashford v. City of PortsmouthOhio Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Parsons v. FlemingOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Chavis v. Sycamore City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Rootstown Local School District Board of Education v. Portage County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State ex rel. Chavis v. Sycamore City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Municipal Construction Equipment Operators' Labor Council v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API