Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Walling v. Rutherford Food Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 18, 1946No. 3213Published

1ConcurrencePhillips, Circuit Judge

Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, provides that “Findings of fact shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, * * * ” On appeal, a finding of fact made by the trial court, if supported by substantial evidence, is binding on this court.1

The credibility of witnesses, the weight to he given to their evidence,2 and the inferences which may be reasonably drawn from the evidence are matters within the province of the trial court.3

Here, the trial court found that in 1942 the United States government began purchasing large quantities of beef…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bowles v. Nu Way Laundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  2. Kincade v. MiklesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  3. Walling v. Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  4. Continental Petroleum Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  5. Board of Com'rs of Caddo County, Okl. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API