Bowles v. Nu Way Laundry Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
This appeal involves the correctness of a judgment of the District Court holding that the appellee, NuWay Laundry Company, had not violated the Emergency Price Control Act of January 30, 1942, 56 Stat. 23, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 901 et seq., as amended by the Inflation Control Act of October 2, 1942, 56 Stat. 765, 50 U.S. C.A. Appendix § 961 et seq., or the Maximum Price Regulations issued in pursuance thereof, and denying an injunction authorized by Section 205(a) as prayed by the Price Administrator in a suit specifically charging violations of Maximum Price Regulation…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Lockerty v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Ring v. SpinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Bowles v. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- Speten v. BowlesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Bowles v. MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
- Bowles v. AmmonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.