Legal Opinion

Quest Exploration and Development Company v. Transco Energy Company and Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 27, 1994No. 93-2536PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIENER, Circuit Judge:

In this suit to void a settlement agreement on grounds of, inter alia, fraudulent inducement and economic duress, Plaintiff-Appellant Quest Exploration and Development Company (Quest) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees Transco Energy Company and Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation (collectively, Transco 1 ). Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

I

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Quest owned an interest in mineral production in the South Lake Arthur Field, principally a natural gas field situated in portions of Jefferson…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Trenholm v. RatcliffTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Kenneth Walker v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  5. Haralson v. E.F. Hutton Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Brittan Communications International Corp. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  2. Hicks v. BryschDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1997
  3. Itt Commercial Finance Corporation v. Bank of the WestCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  4. Hicks v. Bexar County, Tex.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1997
  5. National Western Life Insurance v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API