Legal Opinion
Rochester Ford v. Ford Motor C o .
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided June 21, 2001No. CV-99-559-MPublished
1Opinion of the Court
Rochester Ford v . Ford Motor C o . CV-99-559-M 06/21/01 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Rochester Ford Sales, Inc.; and Meredith S . Pierce, Trustee of J. Pierce Trust, Plaintiffs v. Civil N o . 99-559-M Opinion N o .
2001 DNH 115
Ford Motor Company, Defendant O R D E R Having considered defendant’s motion for summary judgment (document n o . 24) on the remaining claims, plaintiff’s objection and memorandum of law (documents n o . 2 7 , 2 8 ) , and the oral arguments presented, the court grants defendant’s motion. Two claims remain in this case. Counts II and IV of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Vincent DeNOVELLIS, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Mazda Motors of America, Inc. v. Southwestern Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Schmitt-Norton Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.