Legal Opinion

United States v. Rush

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided January 26, 2001No. 00-0096/ARPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE CASE OF UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Maurice RUSH, Private U.S. Army, Appellant No. 00-0096 Crim. App. No. 9701687 United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Argued October 3, 2000 Decided January 26, 2001 SULLIVAN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which GIERKE and BAKER, JJ., joined. EFFRON, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. CRAWFORD, C.J., filed an opinion concurring in the result. Counsel For Appellant: Captain Steven P. Haight (argued); Colonel Adele H. Odegard, Major Jonathan F. Potter, and Captain David S. Hurt (on brief); Lieutenant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  2. United States v. GreavesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  3. United States v. TuallaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  4. United States v. SorianoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  5. United States v. NealUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API