Hurst v. Siemens Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BUCKWALTER, Senior District Judge.
Currently pending before the Court is. Defendants Siemens Corporation Group Insurance and Flexible Health Programs (“Siemens”) and Cigna Behavioral Health, Inc. (“CBH”) (collectively, “Defendants”)’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to all claims asserted by Plaintiff Kevin Hurst (“Plaintiff’). For the following reasons, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is granted.
*716I. FACTUAL HISTORY1
Defendant Siemens is an employee welfare benefit plan (“the Plan”) established by Siemens Corporation pursuant to ERISA, which is designed to provide health…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- D. v. Independence Blue CrossDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- L. v. Excellus Blue Cross Blue ShieldDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020