Legal Opinion

United States v. Suerte

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 14, 2002No. 01-20626PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:

At issue is whether, for extraterritorial application of the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act, 46 U.S.CApp. § 1901 et seq., the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause requires a nexus between a foreign citizen and the United States, where the flag nation for his vessel “has consented or waived objection to the enforcement of United States law by the United States”. Id. § 1903(c)(1)(C). Requiring such a nexus, the district court dismissed the indictment for lack of jurisdiction. VACATED and REMANDED.

I

Defendant Nestor Suerte, a Philippine national and…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Lauritzen v. LarsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Bowsher v. SynarSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. United States v. Geovanni Quintero RendonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. PerlazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Ali AliCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. BravoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Vilches-NavarreteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API