Legal Opinion

Daikichi Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 3, 2003No. 01-1473PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT

2Per curiam

This cause was considered on the record compiled before the National Labor Relations Board, the briefs of the parties, and oral arguments by counsel.

The Board reasonably determined, based on substantial evidence in the record, that Daikichi violated Section 8(a)(1) of the Act by making certain statements to employees and violated Sections 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(3) of the Act by refusing to rehire certain employees based on union activity. Drawing an adverse inference from Daiki-chi’s failure to produce Watanabe to testify regarding his speech was not improper under the circumstances.…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw) v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Parsippany Hotel Management Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  3. Meco Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Low Kit Mining Company, a Successor to Spangler Coal Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  5. Warshawsky & Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Metropolitan Regional Council of CarpentersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Metropolitan Regional Council of CarpentersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API