State v. Garcia
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.
¶ 1. Rodolfo Garcia appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion seeking to withdraw his pleas of no contest to four controlled substances charges. Garcia contends that the trial court failed to comply with WlS. STAT. § 971.08(l)(c), which requires a trial court to personally advise a defendant who enters a plea of guilty or no contest of the risk of deportation. We hold that a trial court is required to personally address the defendant in the express words of the statute. However, pursuant to State v. Chavez, 175 Wis. 2d 366, 498 N.W.2d 887 (Ct. App. 1993), we determine that the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. ChavezCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
- State v. IssaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
- State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. LindellWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. DouangmalaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. Jose Alberto Reyes FuerteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. MalcolmSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. LagundoyeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.