Nicewarner v. Bleavins
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, District Judge.
This matter was tried to the Court on May 17, 18 and 19, 1965, and written memoranda have been submitted in lieu of final argument. The matter now stands submitted. This opinion sufficiently sets forth the facts so as to render formal findings unnecessary.
Plaintiffs Lloyd E. and Amelia J. Nice-warner seek the return of moneys paid by them for the purchase of a one per cent, interest in retained inventor’s royalties on the ground that this transaction violated sections 12(1) and 12(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, [Title 15 U.S.C. § 77K1) and (2)],…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Ralston Purina Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. Carl D. SchaeferCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
- Repass v. ReesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1959
3Cited by16 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,588 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stephen MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,213 Hill York Corporation v. American International Franchises, Inc., Gurn H. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- In Re Caesars Palace Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Katz v. Amos Treat & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,507 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Continental Tobacco Company of South Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.