Legal Opinion
McCormick v. City of Norfolk
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided April 12, 2002No. S-00-1332PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.
The appellants, Patrick and Michele McCormick, filed this action under the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 13-901 et seq. (Reissue 1997), for personal injuries sustained by their 9-year-old daughter, Alyssa M. Wickert McCormick. The district court sustained the demurrer of the appellee, City of Norfolk (City), and dismissed the petition. The court found that the City’s acts and omissions were immune from liability under § 13-910(9). The court found that the petition could not be amended to state a claim against the City and dismissed the petition. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Nawrocki v. MacOmb County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Alexander v. EldredNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- City of Midland v. Sullivan, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2000
- Department of Transp. v. NeilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- City of St. Petersburg v. CollomSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Davis v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- Stahlecker v. Ford Motor Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Bronsen v. Dawes CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- Wise v. Omaha Public SchoolsNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- Tadros v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.