Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Tadros v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 2005No. S-03-1336PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

NATURE OF CASE

Georgett Tadros was seriously injured when she was struck by a vehicle as she walked across West Center Road in Omaha, Nebraska. Tadros alleged that the City of Omaha (City) was negligent in programming the crosswalk signal at the intersection and that the driver who struck her was negligent in failing to yield the right-of-way to a pedestrian. The district court found that Tadros’ contributory negligence precluded her from recovery, and it dismissed her petition. Tadros appealed, and the City has filed a cross-appeal.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

In actions brought pursuant to the Political…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Aslakson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  2. Jasa Ex Rel. Jasa v. Douglas CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Maresh v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Nebraska, Inc. v. DaileyNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Styskal v. BrickeyNebraska Supreme Court · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Staley v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Porter v. Knife River, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Tadros v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Juston Pohl v. County of FurnasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  5. Gonzalez v. Union Pacific RR. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API